0
By clicking the button, I accept the Terms of Use of the service and its Privacy Policy, as well as consent to the processing of personal data.
Don’t have an account? Signup
Powered by :
The bench had unanimously held that it could not amend the provisions of the Special Marriage Act (SMA) to include non-heterosexual couples.
Share this article
If you liked this article share it with your friends.they will thank you later
/pratidin/media/media_files/2025/02/10/AtKfrSBhbSAMSXi61skn.jpg)
/pratidin/media/media_files/2025/01/09/QJlccLe5QzuAXG0zSJsE.webp)
2 Min read
/pratidin/media/post_attachments/pratidintime/2023-10/1ec7fc34-0df8-453c-a177-760409f7bfc9/WEB_PT_lgbtq.jpg)
/pratidin/media/post_attachments/pratidintime/2023-05/ee0bb1ed-318b-473d-9026-39cb77b91091/India_s_LGBT_community_celebrate_the_Supreme_Courts_decision_credit_AFP.jpg)
/pratidin/media/post_attachments/pratidintime/import/2019/05/Taiwan-approves-same-sex-marriage.jpg)
/pratidin/media/agency_attachments/2024/11/06/2024-11-06t060101441z-pratidin-logo.png){kind=logo}
