/pratidin/media/media_files/2025/01/23/t3TCrdQLFjHxjlT89ppn.jpg)
Subhas Chandra Bose
As India commemorates Parakram Diwas on January 23, marking the birth anniversary of Subhas Chandra Bose, a crucial question lingers—has independent India truly embraced Netaji’s vision? Despite his towering legacy and unmatched contribution to India’s freedom struggle, Bose remains an enigma, often reduced to ceremonial tributes rather than being recognized as a revolutionary force whose ideas could have reshaped the nation.
Beyond the Shadows of History
Subhas Chandra Bose was not merely a nationalist leader; he was a radical visionary who sought complete and uncompromising independence from British rule. Unlike the non-violent approach spearheaded by Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress, Bose believed that armed struggle was the only way to dismantle the colonial yoke. His ideological divergence with the Congress, culminating in his resignation as Congress President in 1939, was not just a political difference—it was a defining moment in India’s independence movement.
While history books extensively document his role in the Indian National Army (INA) and his wartime alliances, a crucial aspect of Bose’s legacy remains overlooked—his economic and political vision for a post-independence India. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Bose had a concrete plan for industrialization, social justice, and national security, which he believed were essential for India to emerge as a global power.
The INA and the Forgotten War for Independence
Bose’s leadership of the Azad Hind Fauj (INA) was not just an act of defiance; it was an alternate struggle for independence that threatened the very foundation of British rule. His famous call—“Give me blood, and I will give you freedom”—was not just rhetoric; it was a battle cry that inspired thousands of Indians to take up arms against the British Empire.
The INA’s offensive against British India, though militarily unsuccessful, rattled the colonial administration. The Red Fort trials of 1945, where INA officers were tried for treason, sparked nationwide outrage. It is widely believed that these trials, coupled with the unrest in the British Indian military, played a crucial role in hastening British withdrawal. Yet, independent India has largely sidelined Bose’s contributions, giving precedence to the narrative of non-violent resistance.
Mystery, Controversy, and the Unanswered Questions
The circumstances surrounding Bose’s disappearance in 1945 remain one of India’s greatest unsolved mysteries. While the official narrative suggests he perished in a plane crash in Taiwan, several reports and classified documents point to alternative theories, including possibilities of his capture and secret imprisonment. Successive Indian governments have maintained ambiguity on the issue, fueling speculation and conspiracy theories.
This secrecy raises uncomfortable questions—was Bose’s radical approach too inconvenient for the post-independence political establishment? Did the power structures of newly independent India deliberately sideline his legacy to ensure that the dominant narrative remained centered around non-violence?
The India Bose Dreamed Of—And the Reality Today
Bose’s vision for India was built on three pillars: a strong military-industrial complex, socialist economic policies, and absolute secularism. He believed that a newly independent India needed a robust defense system to prevent future invasions and colonial interference. His emphasis on scientific development and industrial self-sufficiency was decades ahead of its time. He envisioned an India where economic disparity was eliminated, and where all communities coexisted under a common national identity, free from sectarian politics.
However, modern India has largely strayed from this vision. While the country has emerged as an economic power, industrialization remains uneven, and military self-reliance is still a work in progress. Social and political divisions have widened, and the very secular fabric that Bose fiercely advocated is under strain. The question remains—if India had followed Bose’s roadmap, would the nation have taken a different trajectory?
Restoring Netaji’s Rightful Place in History
Honoring Bose with Parakram Diwas is a step forward, but symbolic gestures alone do not do justice to his legacy. The real tribute to Netaji would be to integrate his economic and political philosophies into contemporary governance. The government must declassify all files related to Bose’s disappearance to bring closure to an enduring historical question. More importantly, India needs to recognize that its freedom was not won solely through non-violent struggle, but also through the sacrifices of thousands who followed Bose’s call to arms.
Netaji’s fight was not just against colonial rule—it was against complacency, against stagnation, and against a vision of India that accepted compromise. On this Parakram Diwas, it is time to move beyond mere tributes and ask—how much of Netaji’s dream have we truly realized? And more importantly, how much of it are we willing to pursue?
As Bose once said, "It is blood alone that can pay the price of freedom. Give me blood, and I will give you freedom." Today, that price is not blood, but the courage to redefine our national priorities, to rise above partisan politics, and to build an India that truly embodies the ideals he stood for.