/pratidin/media/media_files/2025/01/13/Q48eNd7BY6ZPw0I1KdoO.jpg)
Cultural Heritage or Animal Cruelty? Assam's Magh Bihu Debate
A recent decision by the Gauhati High Court to ban traditional sports, such as buffalo and bulbul fights during the Magh Bihu celebrations has sparked a heated debate across Assam. For many, this ruling feels like a direct challenge to the state’s centuries-old cultural practices, leading to a rift between those who see these traditions as integral to their identity and those who view them as cruel and outdated.
However, it is also worth noting that animal sacrifices, often carried out in the name of religious beliefs, are still being practiced in various worship places across Assam. This raises the question of consistency in how animal rights are applied, especially when comparing traditional festivals and rituals.
While the focus remains on the ethical treatment of animals in festivals like Magh Bihu, similar practices under the guise of religious observance seem to be exempt from scrutiny.
Magh Bihu, celebrated as a harvest festival, is not only an agricultural observance but also a time for communities to come together through traditional sports that include buffalo fights and, in some areas, bulbul bird contests. These events are seen by many as an embodiment of the connection between rural life and the land, deeply ingrained in the fabric of the state's history and social dynamics.
A Deeply Rooted Cultural Practice
For generations, the buffalo fights in Assam have been more than just an entertainment event. They are steeped in history, with roots going back to the reign of Ahom king Swargadeo Rudra Singha. The ritual involves intense preparation and care, with farmers raising and training their buffaloes for months, seeing the animals as integral parts of their lives and livelihoods.
“Magh Bihu is not merely a festival; it’s the essence of rural Assam,” says a farmer from Sivasagar. “By banning these events, they are erasing a part of our soul, our connection to nature, and our heritage.”
The ruling, which is based on the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, and the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, has sparked mixed reactions. While animal rights groups applaud the High Court’s stance, those from rural communities see the decision as an infringement on their right to preserve and celebrate their cultural traditions.
“We do not see buffalo fights as cruelty,” says another farmer from Lakhimpur. “These events are part of our identity. It’s a part of life, not a spectacle for outsiders.”
Legal Rationale vs. Cultural Identity
The court’s decision was grounded in concerns about animal welfare, with the government’s efforts to regulate these practices through a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) deemed insufficient. The court’s stance aligns with the broader trend of legal action against animal cruelty, such as the 2014 Supreme Court judgment in the A. Nagaraja case, which placed significant restrictions on practices like Jallikattu.
But critics argue that such comparisons fail to capture the uniqueness of Assam’s traditions. “Jallikattu and buffalo fights are not the same,” says a cultural historian. “These events in Assam have cultural significance—they are not about exploitation but about mutual respect between man and animal. To simply label them as cruelty is to erase our cultural history.”
While the legal argument focuses on the ethical treatment of animals, critics of the ban contend that this one-size-fits-all approach ignores the deep cultural and economic ties that these traditions have for rural communities. The economic impact of these festivals, often a major source of income for local vendors, farmers, and rural economies, is undeniable.
“These festivals are crucial for the livelihood of many in rural areas. The ban threatens to dismantle fragile local economies that rely on these events,” says an economist based in Guwahati.
The Ethical Dilemma: Animal Welfare vs. Cultural Heritage
The debate over the Magh Bihu contests is also intertwined with broader concerns about animal rights. Animal welfare groups like PETA have been vocal in their opposition to the practice, calling it "glorified bloodsport" and citing the harm caused to the animals. They argue that no cultural or religious justification can justify the suffering of animals for entertainment.
For wildlife conservationists, the banning of bulbul fights, another practice associated with Magh Bihu, is equally important. “Bulbuls are wild animals. They are not meant to be used as performers,” says a prominent wildlife conservationist. “The idea that they are part of a religious tradition does not justify exploiting them for human amusement.”
Despite the ethical concerns raised by animal rights groups, many residents in Assam feel strongly that their cultural practices should be respected. “It’s not just about bulbuls—it’s about our right to celebrate our culture,” says a member of the temple committee at Hajo, where the bulbul fights have been a traditional event for centuries.
Striking a Balance: Preserving Tradition with Ethical Responsibility
At the heart of this issue lies a larger question: how can Assam reconcile the preservation of its traditions with modern ethical standards? While the High Court’s ruling has ignited emotions, experts suggest that there is potential for compromise.
“Traditions must evolve to align with contemporary values,” says an ethnographer at Tezpur University. “We can preserve the essence of these practices while ensuring the ethical treatment of animals through strict regulations and oversight.”
The challenge, experts argue, lies in finding a middle ground—one that allows cultural practices to continue without compromising the welfare of animals involved. As the legal and cultural debate unfolds, it’s clear that finding such a balance will be no easy task.
A Crossroads for Assam’s Identity
The Magh Bihu controversy is not just about buffalo fights or bulbul contests—it’s about the future of Assam’s identity. Can the state continue to honor its rich cultural heritage while meeting the ethical expectations of the modern world? Or will traditions that have defined the state for centuries be swept away in the tide of progress?
As Assam grapples with these questions, the decision to ban these traditional sports will undoubtedly have long-term repercussions. For now, the people of Assam, particularly those in rural communities, are left to navigate the emotional and economic fallout of a decision that has forced them to reconsider their very identity.